Skip to main content

What's New for HR in Illinois - 2019

Yesterday I did a report for one of my clients.  Today, I have been asked to talk to a networking group about What's New in HR.  In three weeks I have been asked to talk at a local Chamber of Commerce luncheon about What's Hot in HR.  So whether it new, hot or trending, I though I'd just jot down some thoughts I and several #HR friends had from a crowdsourcing post.

Let's start out with what is top of mind for me and my clients:

  1. SALARY HISTORY BAN: Don’t Ask for the Salary History of ANY applicant for employment of any position in Illinois effective last month.  This affects all employers regardless of size and if you decide not to follow the law then an applicant can come after you for up to 10k for damages.  Why? Asking perpetuates an already unequal pay issue for women who currently make 78 cents to every man's dollar or the same job with the same qualifications.
  2. SEXUAL HARASSMENT TRAINING FOR ALL EMPLOYEES IN ILLINOIS. Every employer in the state of Illinois will have to train all their employees annually  on sexual harassment prevention starting 1/1/20.  Specifically, the training must cover the following and if they do not there could be civil penalties up to $5k per offense.
    • Define sexual harassment;
    • Provide examples of prohibited conduct;
    • State that it is the employer’s responsibility to prevent, investigate and address sexual harassment; and
    • Summarize federal and state laws addressing sexual harassment, and available remedies for violation thereof.
  3. MINIMUM WAGE x3 IN ONE YEAR.  Next years double increase of minimum wage is going to hit employers not once but twice.  January 1 the minimum wage increases from 8.25 to 9.25 ($1) and in July it goes up another 75cents to $10 per hour.  Not to mention in six more months one year from the first increase it goes up another dollar to $11.  This puts Illinois among the 10 highest minimum wage states in the country.  That is an increase of $2.75 all in one years time.  Have you thought about how this is going to affect the rest of your staff and what type of compression pay issues it will cause? 
  4. POSITIVE FOR MARIJUANA DOES NOT = RESCINDED OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT: Don’t Test for Marijuana for hire effective 1/1/20 because your wasting your money if you do and you can't use it as a reason not to hire or affect any other condition of employment once hired.  However, you can maintain a drug free workplace which means that after someone is hired and are suspected of being under the influence at work they can be tested.  Of course, all this is up for debate at the upcoming IL Veto Session to be held soon in Springfield.  There are many conflicts with federal DOT and protective services testing requirements.  So while it may on the surface seem to apply to all there are some issues to be resolved.I'd wait till after that session to know for sure what is going to STICK.  
  5. DOL INCREASES EXEMPTION THRESHOLD FOR LOW AND HIGH PAID OVERTIME EXEMPT EMPLOYEES. No position paid less than $35, 568 (plus duties test) can be exempt from making overtime.  This is equivalent to $684 a week (previously $455 a week or $23,660 a year). Conversely, you can exempt any position paid over $107,432 a year (previously $100k a year) and they do not have to pass a duties test.  These totals are without regard to nondiscretionary bonuses or incentive payments.
  6. EXEMPTION DUTIES AUDIT. Just because the salary basis may have been or will be corrected based on #4 above doesn't mean the people you have as exempt (aka salaried) should actually be categories that way.  There is a lot more to salary basis to make a position exempt (see  https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime/fs17a_overview.pdf). Typically, I find positions in the administrative and professional exemption category incorrect.  It's often based on the perception of what a professional or administrative job is and not based on the facts related to the duties.  The problem with this that an incorrect classification can lead to up to three years back pay for overtime not paid to someone who should have originally been classified as hourly or non-exempt.
  7. W2 EMPLOYEE VS 1099 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR MISCLASSIFICATIONS: Both IRS & IL Unemployment have a vested financial interest in whether or not employer classify positions correctly.  Most importantly the employee themselves has the most to loose aside paying their own taxes they could be earning benefits.  Like exemption misclassifications above an employer could be required to go back three years to pay salary and benefits.  I have some clients who are paying employees a stipend that does not even cover minimum wage for employees using their offices, computers, vehicles, etc. and have required hours.  That alone would not pass the 20 question IRS employee vs contractor test: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/employee-or-independent-contractor-know-the-rules
Others within my network suggested the following which I plan to expand on soon.
  • Artificial Intelligence hot in recruiting -Chatbots
  • Cybersecurity in HR
  • Employee Engagement: Tenure & Peer2Peer Based Recognition
  • Employee Retention
  • Workplace Flexibility
  • Retaliation & Age Discrimination High on EEOC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

55 Active Job Search Sites (Updated 7/19)

I had a company encouraging me to update this list over the last couple of months.  Since they focus on veteran hiring and I am a veteran supporting other veterans I am happy to add the following to this original posting from 2017. Silent Professionals is a free veteran recruitment service. Their differentiating factor is that they focus on a very specific subset of veteran employment which is the combat arms veteran. Their site is much more than just a job board because they actually provide a service behind it which is all free to the veteran. As combat veterans themselves, with a vast amount of experience in the private security sector, they are able to use that experience and influence within the industry to act as trusted advocates for the veteran candidate. They boast an incredible 84% job placement success rate for candidates that they recommend to employers. One of the reasons they're able to do that is because of their focus on jobs for combat veterans who are seek

Honest, Vulnerable, and Transparent Communications Can Be a Curse for Women

As we approach yet another end to Women’s History Month where organizations make a sincere concerted effort to raise awareness to the issues women face in the workplace with hope for continued change, I am skeptical. Not because I do not believe in the effort. Not because I have not heard story after story of women who have made history and are honored and respected highly for women’s suffrage progress they have made. Not because I do not believe in change. I do believe strongly in the effort that brings these stories to the public causing change. However, the reason I am skeptical is the same reason so many other women question the possibility of real change. Why, because we have been victims who feel defeated repeatedly and constantly reminded of the loss experienced. When you feel you have taken two steps forward and knocked five steps back every time that original wound opens and reminds us of the curse lived just because we are a woman. I had to be quiet about the real reason I

HR Assessment Risk Summary

In summarizing the potential for risk in the human resources and personnel practices of organizations visited over the past few years, the highest risk of audits, investigations, grievances and the resulting potential for penalties, fines and legal concerns come from six primary sources.   The main reason for concerns are because certain federal and state agencies are making it a priority to investigate: Misclassification of employees as exempt, Illinois led the nation in active investigations 3,635 involving 19,765 misclassifications, 245.6 million in unreported taxable wages, 5.1 million in unemployment tax unreported, 270,570 employees impacted. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced that 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the federal agency nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017, and secured $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litiga