Skip to main content

Grievances and the Hiring Process

Units of local government have the responsibility to conduct business in the most transparent manner possible.  This includes the hiring process. Applicants for public jobs should feel confident that the selection process was fair and designed so that the most qualified candidate was chosen.  In addition, in some cases internal applicants for vacancies may have appeal rights through the grievance process covered in the applicable collective bargaining agreement (CBA).   It is important to always follow the appropriate article in the CBA that details hiring, so make sure you double check before filling any union covered position. If followed, the chance of having a grievance filed will be diminished.

However, grievances can happen after the selection process has concluded. Both internal and external candidates for positions can file complaints.  External candidates are most likely to file a complaint with the Illinois Department of Human Rights or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.


As a result, it is vital to have a well-documented hiring process.  With thorough documentation, management should be able to demonstrate that the candidate who best met the requirements detailed in the position description was selected for the position.

What makes a well-documented hiring process?


·       Current and accurate position descriptions.  Ensuring the accuracy of your position descriptions is the basis for screening, interviewing questions and later, for evaluations.

·       Create interview questions based off the position description.  Questions should:

o   Assess whether the candidate has the required level of job knowledge that is both essential to job performance and constitutes the minimum that must be known prior to entering the position.

o   Determine the extent to which the candidate has, in fact, ever performed the major duties of the position for which she/he is applying.

o   For those jobs with few or only very basic minimum requirements, as well as for jobs with some unpleasant or monotonous working conditions, questions should be prepared regarding the candidate’s understanding of, and willingness to perform the major duties.

o   Be accurate, complete and easily understood.

o   Clearly and strictly job-related and directly linked to the position’s major duties

o   Not be leading in order to avoid biasing a candidate’s response

o   Should be stated in terms of sample position duties, and should be designed to elicit information on job-related behaviors

o   Should be geared to the appropriate complexity level of the position

o   Should be carefully reviewed to eliminate any possible reference to prohibited areas of inquiry.

·       Create a scoring method for the interview process.  A numeric rating enables the calculation of an overall score for ranking purposes. Carefully document the candidate’s response to each question. Write up a justification as to why the final candidate was selected.

Establishing a formal hiring process that is well documented will help ensure that all hiring decisions are based on merit and qualification and will help management demonstrate the reasoning behind hiring decisions should a grievance or litigation ever occur. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

55 Active Job Search Sites (Updated 7/19)

I had a company encouraging me to update this list over the last couple of months.  Since they focus on veteran hiring and I am a veteran supporting other veterans I am happy to add the following to this original posting from 2017. Silent Professionals is a free veteran recruitment service. Their differentiating factor is that they focus on a very specific subset of veteran employment which is the combat arms veteran. Their site is much more than just a job board because they actually provide a service behind it which is all free to the veteran. As combat veterans themselves, with a vast amount of experience in the private security sector, they are able to use that experience and influence within the industry to act as trusted advocates for the veteran candidate. They boast an incredible 84% job placement success rate for candidates that they recommend to employers. One of the reasons they're able to do that is because of their focus on jobs for combat veterans who are seek

Honest, Vulnerable, and Transparent Communications Can Be a Curse for Women

As we approach yet another end to Women’s History Month where organizations make a sincere concerted effort to raise awareness to the issues women face in the workplace with hope for continued change, I am skeptical. Not because I do not believe in the effort. Not because I have not heard story after story of women who have made history and are honored and respected highly for women’s suffrage progress they have made. Not because I do not believe in change. I do believe strongly in the effort that brings these stories to the public causing change. However, the reason I am skeptical is the same reason so many other women question the possibility of real change. Why, because we have been victims who feel defeated repeatedly and constantly reminded of the loss experienced. When you feel you have taken two steps forward and knocked five steps back every time that original wound opens and reminds us of the curse lived just because we are a woman. I had to be quiet about the real reason I

HR Assessment Risk Summary

In summarizing the potential for risk in the human resources and personnel practices of organizations visited over the past few years, the highest risk of audits, investigations, grievances and the resulting potential for penalties, fines and legal concerns come from six primary sources.   The main reason for concerns are because certain federal and state agencies are making it a priority to investigate: Misclassification of employees as exempt, Illinois led the nation in active investigations 3,635 involving 19,765 misclassifications, 245.6 million in unreported taxable wages, 5.1 million in unemployment tax unreported, 270,570 employees impacted. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced that 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the federal agency nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017, and secured $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litiga