Skip to main content

HR Assessment Risk Summary

In summarizing the potential for risk in the human resources and personnel practices of organizations visited over the past few years, the highest risk of audits, investigations, grievances and the resulting potential for penalties, fines and legal concerns come from six primary sources.  The main reason for concerns are because certain federal and state agencies are making it a priority to investigate:
  • Misclassification of employees as exempt, Illinois led the nation in active investigations 3,635 involving 19,765 misclassifications, 245.6 million in unreported taxable wages, 5.1 million in unemployment tax unreported, 270,570 employees impacted.
  • The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced that 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the federal agency nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017, and secured $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litigation.
  • Illinois ranks 6th in the nation in the number of EEOC charges filed by employees, of those charges 54.2% were regarding retaliation by an employer.
  •  Employee Eligibility Verification I-9 compliance, $110 per form, $110 per error, up to $1,100 per error 3rd offense.
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act compliance willful $100 to $1,100 per violation plus damages, fines and legal fees.
  • Independent Contractor misclassification unpaid federal, state & other withholding, unpaid WC & unemployment premiums, work expenses, overtime, along with interest & penalties levied.  Claims have been staggering amounts to employers.  ACA in 2015 fines $2,000 per employee not covered.
It is these six that are both common outcomes of the assessments done and the most likely for future risk. However, the risks don’t end with these six.  Related concern for employer problems comes from a variety of HR Forms not being used at all or used in outdate and non-compliant manner.
  •  job applications
  • employee handbooks or policy manuals
  •  I-9 Forms
  • EEO-1 or EEO-4
  • VETS-4212
  • FMLA Applications
  • Notification, rights, release and signature authorization  of all background inquiries, particularly credit checks under FCRA
Collectively, human resource documents being inconsistently used throughout organizations, in various versions, or not at all can add to the additional risks related to personnel files and records management and retention. Recommended areas for additional human resources consulting would begin with the following:
  • EEOC compliance and Affirmative Action Plan development (to include EEO-4 & VETS-100)
  • Compensation & Benefits Analysis and Wage Studies
  • Exempt/Non-Exempt Audits (to include independent Contractors)
  • Employee Eligibility Verification I-9 Training (E-Verify)
  • HR Forms Audit and Form Development
  • FMLA Training for all Management and Department Heads
  • Recruiting & Hiring Best Practices Training
  • Personnel Files and Records Retention Training

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

55 Active Job Search Sites (Updated 7/19)

I had a company encouraging me to update this list over the last couple of months.  Since they focus on veteran hiring and I am a veteran supporting other veterans I am happy to add the following to this original posting from 2017. Silent Professionals is a free veteran recruitment service. Their differentiating factor is that they focus on a very specific subset of veteran employment which is the combat arms veteran. Their site is much more than just a job board because they actually provide a service behind it which is all free to the veteran. As combat veterans themselves, with a vast amount of experience in the private security sector, they are able to use that experience and influence within the industry to act as trusted advocates for the veteran candidate. They boast an incredible 84% job placement success rate for candidates that they recommend to employers. One of the reasons they're able to do that is because of their focus on jobs for combat veterans who are seek...

MORE Consolidated List of SHRM Certification Announcement Posts with LINKS (Updated)

UPDATE 5/21: Added one more post and link below from Workforce.com not found last night when I originally wrote this post. On the eve of my attempt to help our local CIC-SHRM members make sense of the news of last week at our bi-monthly meeting tomorrow, I did another search. Again, I will wait to comment fully about my own understanding and opinions until after I get a response from SHRM regarding a question I have that has yet to be addressed and I hear again from our regional MAC rep on a call I am scheduled to participate in on Thursday. However, I do want to rescind and revise a comment I made in my earlier post. Last week I stated the following which is not entirely true: “The fact that the HRCI Executive Director did not receive advance notification leaves me a bit disappointed for a variety of reasons.” The HRCI Executive Director did know about SHRMs plans because she is part of the board where the topic was discussed. However, she did not know the communication would go...

Transgender Drug Testing

Recently, a client asked me if they needed to adjust their drug testing policy so a transgender employee could choose the gender of the person observing them urinate for a test. Obviously, the person wanted the employee to feel comfortable with who was in the room with them. First of all, having another employee watch you urinate can be uncomfortable for anyone, for any reason, but it is a requirement for some drug tests in order to ensure that the testee doesn’t bring in a bag of someone else’s urine to exchange as their own. If the reason is not obvious, it is so they do not test positive when they know they have been under the influence of drugs or alcohol. So, I did some research and thought it would be good to share this information for other employers, managers, small business owners and HR managers who may have similar questions. What are the requirements to be an observer for a direct observed collection? According to the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing ...