Skip to main content

Profanity in the Workplace

I ran across this post written by my good friend and fellow HR professional Kevin Epley, SHRM-SCP, SPHR and thought it would be an excellent guest post because I have ran into this problem in the past myself.
As a Human Resources professional have you ever found yourself doing battle with the problem of profanity in your workplace? In my industry, Automotive Retail Sales and Service, there seems to be a “good old boy” and “that’s the way it’s always been” culture that has allowed for profanity. It goes against our goals of culture change, continued diversity and renewed customer service strategies. Besides, it’s simply unpleasant. And, what does “profanity in the workplace” have to do legislative news? I’ll get to that.

Short of becoming the “profanity Nazi” (Seinfeld Soup Nazi episode) or HR as overly parental, I wrestle with the prevalence and the problems of profanity in our workplace. In researching for support, I’ve discovered it’s more common a problem than first thought. It doesn’t help that Millennials, and even younger workers, are increasingly tolerant of profanities presence. Or, perhaps, I’m becoming a “prude” in my advancing years?

So, I thought I’d share a few of the key takeaways I’ve discovered from this topic of Profanity in the Workplace. I’ll begin with NLRB’s role in profanity. It can be considered employee’s protected concerted activity, Hooter’s Restaurant court case. Or not, City of Portland 2013 case, on grounds of religion. The hard and fast rule, of which there are few, profanity may not be in violation of EEO guidelines explicitly related to profanity of a religious, racial, ethnic, and gender-based nature. Companies should also have a zero-tolerance policy for language regarding sexual acts. Stop the “F-bombs”! Another hard and fast rule, one in which many employees have found themselves in disciplinary hot water.

So, what is an employer to do, ignore or develop policy that can lead to their own F-bomb, “Firing”? Policy should consider the type of industry, culture and amount of direct customer contact. Evaluate the context of the profanity. Was it a rare outburst resulting from an unusual negative work outcome? Or, was it part of an ongoing, sustained feud between employees that became intimidating, hostile and could result in a charge of workplace harassment, or violence? Put policy in writing. Be concise, specific and clear about expectations and outcomes from your employees. Train supervisors and managers in handling the subject of profanity. As always, run policy and enforcement issues by company legal to be sure you’re on solid legal footing.

I’ll leave you with a few eye-opening statistics I stumbled upon that help me better understand why profanity may be better left at home, in the car, or fall silent. A recent CareerBuilder survey discovered;

  • 81% of employers believe cursing brings an employee's professionalism into question
  • 64% of employers think less of an employee who swears repeatedly
  • 57% said they are less likely to promote someone who uses curse words
  • 71% of employers said that swearing shows a "lack of control," while 68% says swearing demonstrates a "lack of maturity"
  • Perhaps most interestingly, says CareerBuilder.com spokesperson Jennifer Grasz, is that 54% of employers said that swearing made their employees appear "less intelligent" 
It should be noted that there are some that believe profanity in the workplace is a positive thing. Adam Connors, partner at Spire Search Partners in Hoboken, N.J., disagrees-- he says that swearing in the workplace can actually be a positive or neutral thing, depending on the context. “Profanity, by itself, is not going to keep someone from the promotion they deserve,” says Mr. Connors.

 “After all, the Mythbusters confirmed that swearing helps you to tolerate pain. So, no getting mad at people when they smash their finger with a hammer and let bad words fly.” Nonetheless, I’ve never found profanity to be a positive thing. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

55 Active Job Search Sites (Updated 7/19)

I had a company encouraging me to update this list over the last couple of months.  Since they focus on veteran hiring and I am a veteran supporting other veterans I am happy to add the following to this original posting from 2017. Silent Professionals is a free veteran recruitment service. Their differentiating factor is that they focus on a very specific subset of veteran employment which is the combat arms veteran. Their site is much more than just a job board because they actually provide a service behind it which is all free to the veteran. As combat veterans themselves, with a vast amount of experience in the private security sector, they are able to use that experience and influence within the industry to act as trusted advocates for the veteran candidate. They boast an incredible 84% job placement success rate for candidates that they recommend to employers. One of the reasons they're able to do that is because of their focus on jobs for combat veterans who are seek

Honest, Vulnerable, and Transparent Communications Can Be a Curse for Women

As we approach yet another end to Women’s History Month where organizations make a sincere concerted effort to raise awareness to the issues women face in the workplace with hope for continued change, I am skeptical. Not because I do not believe in the effort. Not because I have not heard story after story of women who have made history and are honored and respected highly for women’s suffrage progress they have made. Not because I do not believe in change. I do believe strongly in the effort that brings these stories to the public causing change. However, the reason I am skeptical is the same reason so many other women question the possibility of real change. Why, because we have been victims who feel defeated repeatedly and constantly reminded of the loss experienced. When you feel you have taken two steps forward and knocked five steps back every time that original wound opens and reminds us of the curse lived just because we are a woman. I had to be quiet about the real reason I

HR Assessment Risk Summary

In summarizing the potential for risk in the human resources and personnel practices of organizations visited over the past few years, the highest risk of audits, investigations, grievances and the resulting potential for penalties, fines and legal concerns come from six primary sources.   The main reason for concerns are because certain federal and state agencies are making it a priority to investigate: Misclassification of employees as exempt, Illinois led the nation in active investigations 3,635 involving 19,765 misclassifications, 245.6 million in unreported taxable wages, 5.1 million in unemployment tax unreported, 270,570 employees impacted. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced that 84,254 workplace discrimination charges were filed with the federal agency nationwide during fiscal year (FY) 2017, and secured $398 million for victims in the private sector and state and local government workplaces through voluntary resolutions and litiga